|
The
National
BDS
Steering
Committee
has
released
the
following
statement
on
the
eve
of
the
Palestine
Investment
Conference
in
Bethlehem:
Economic
and
social
development
in
Palestine
is
crucial,
and
it
is
imperative
that
we
should
take
should
steps
to
improve
the
current
economic
and
political
situation.
However,
despite
the
ongoing
national
and
international
conferences
designed
to
bring
together
the
national
efforts
and
resources;
and
despite
the
support
of
international
solidarity,
we
believe
that
the
economic
conference
that
will
be
held
in
Bethlehem
over
the
next
few
days,
with
the
attendance
of
official
and
non-official
Israeli
representatives,
has
a
serious
political
implications
that
cannot
be
ignored.
This
conference
comes
at a
time
when
the
Israeli
occupying
power
is
celebrating
an
‘independence’
built
on
our
wounds
and
Nakba.
Also,
since
the
Palestinian
people
are
calling
for
BDS
to
be
leveled
against
Israel,
we
had
hoped
that
the
PIC
would
be a
Palestinian
conference
far
away
from
any
joint
political
and
economic
cooperation
with
the
Occupation.
Our
hopes
in
this
regard
proved
to
be
misplaced.
This
conference
has
been
heavily
promoted
by
the
organizers
as
an
opportunity
to
further
Palestinian
national
development
goals,
and
the
basis
for
a
Palestinian
economic
revival.
However,
nowhere
have
the
organizers
recognized
the
single
most
important
factor
in
achieving
this
goal:
ending
the
occupation,
and
ensuring
independence
and
political
autonomy.
Anything
else
will
result
in
the
creation
of
social
and
economic
conditions
that
will
destroy
any
hope
of
Palestinian
independence.
The
projects
that
are
being
promoted
at
the
Bethlehem
conference
do
not
support
any
Palestinian
political
demand.
The
conference
itself
has
become
a
political
conference,
not
simply
an
economic
one.
It
will
play
host
to
official
American,
Zionist,
Arab
and
PA
delegations.
The
threats
of
this
conference
are
the
following:
·
The
projects
promoted
in
the
Palestinian
Reform
and
Development
Plan
(PRDP)
which
forms
the
backdrop
to
the
conference
are
all
old
projects
which
have
previously
been
promoted
by
the
occupying
power.
One
example
is
the
Japanese
project
for
the
Jordan
Valley:
the
research
for
the
feasibility
study
started
in
1999.
The
industrial
zone
in
Jalame
was
announced
in
1998.
The
‘New
Cities’
project
was
floated
in
2004
by
the
Portland
Trust,
one
of
the
faces
of
the
British
Zionist
lobby.
The
tourism
joint
project
being
discussed
was
first
raised
by
an
organization
called
Tourism4Peace
in
2004
– a
group
who
promote
Jerusalem
as
the
‘capital
of
Israel’,
a
designation
that
has
no
validity
under
international
law.
·
The
Palestinian
Authority
has
allowed
foreign
institutions
and
companies
to
sponsor
the
conference
including
Intel,
an
American
company
that
has
around
$8bn
investments
in
Israel,
and
one
of
whose
factories
was
built
on
Iraq
al-Manchiya,
a
Palestinian
village
north
east
of
Gaza
that
was
destroyed
and
its
people
were
expelled
in
1948.
Another
backer
is
Booz-Allen-Hamilton,
who
have
a
strong
relationship
with
the
American
intelligence,
and
specialize
in
the
field
of
so-called
homeland
security,
producing
intelligence
and
data-collection
equipment.
The
presence
of
such
backers
raises
serious
questions
about
the
agenda
for
the
conference.
·
The
proposed
projects
take
as
their
starting
point
Israeli
participation
in
decision-making,
and
Israeli
control
over
their
legal
status.
In
the
proposed
Jalame
industrial
zone,
the
labour
laws
that
will
be
implemented
on
the
site
will
be
set
on
terms
dictated
by
the
occupying
power,
despite
the
fact
that
the
site
of
the
project
is
in
zone
B
under
Oslo,
under
the
Palestinian
Authority
jurisdiction.
The
tourism
project
to
be
located
south
east
of
Jericho
city
is
termed
‘border
area’
project,
despite
the
fact
that
it
will
be
situated
heart
of
the
Jordan
Valley,
deep
into
the
West
Bank.
The
terms
of
the
project
consolidate
the
Israeli
position
of
refusal
to
discuss
ending
the
occupation
of
the
Jordan
Valley;
now
the
occupation
is
to
exist
with
the
Palestinian
blessing.
·
The
projects
are
designed
to
meet
the
economic
demands
of
the
Israeli
administration,
not
those
of
the
Palestinian
people.
The
Japanese
agricultural
project
in
the
Jordan
Valley
will
be
export
oriented:
it
will
do
nothing
to
ensure
Palestinian
food
security.
The
project
for
recycling
sewage
water
will
use
Israeli
technology,
providing
an
alternative
to
the
Palestinian
demand
made
since
the
beginning
of
Oslo
to
receive
its
fair
legal
international
share
from
the
Jordan
River
and
underground
sources.
·
All
reports
and
studies
that
have
been
produced
concur
that
the
Palestinian
humanitarian
and
economic
crisis
is
caused
by
the
occupation.
Yet
despite
this,
the
conference
is
promoted
as
an
event
that
will
discuss
only
economic,
not
political
issues.
The
conference
puts
forward
the
proposal
that
the
economic
development
of
the
West
Bank
will
somehow
be
achieved
without
any
mention
of
the
cause
of
crisis:
the
Apartheid
Wall,
the
invasions,
the
regime
of
closure
and
checkpoints
and
isolation
of
Palestinian
communities,
and
the
measures
imposed
on
Jerusalem
to
promote
Judaization
the
city.
The
projects
proposed
in
the
PRDP
have
been
developed
under
the
supervision
of
the
World
Bank
and
British
Department
for
International
Development
(DFID),
on
terms
set
by
them.
The
extent
to
which
they
have
determined
agenda
has
in
effect
made
them
a
‘shadow
government’,
setting
out
the
development
and
economic
priorities
of
the
Palestinian
Authority.
These
are
not
the
development
projects
we
want
or
need.
What
we
require
is a
national
Palestinian
conference
with
Arab
and
international
support
for
strengthening
Palestinian
steadfastness
and
as a
step
toward
ending
the
dependency
on
the
occupation
and
its
economy.
Signed,
Steering
Committee
of
the
National
BDS
Committee
National
Committee
for
the
Commemoration
of
the
Nakba |