|
Calling a Spade a Spade:
The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
by Ilan Pappe*
For many years, the term al Nakba, the catastrophe,
seemed a satisfactory term for both the events of 1948 in Palestine and
their impact on our lives today. I think, it is time to use a different
term, 'The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine’.
The term Nakba does not directly imply any
reference to who is behind the catastrophe – anything can cause the
destruction of Palestine, even the Palestinians themselves. Not so when the
term ethnic cleansing is used. It implies an accusation and reference to the
culprits of/for the events that took place not only in the past but happen
also in the present. Far more importantly, it connects policies, such as
ones used to destroy Palestine in 1948, to an ideology which continues to
guide Israel’s policies towards the Palestinians: the Nakba
continues, or more forcefully and accurately, the ethnic cleansing rages on.
In this 58th commemoration of the Nakba, it is time to use openly and
without hesitation the term ethnic cleansing as the best possible term for
describing the expulsion of the Palestinians in 1948.
Ethnic Cleansing is a crime and those who perpetrate it
are criminals. In 1948, the leadership of the Zionist movement, which became
the government of Israel, committed a crime against the Palestinian people.
The crime was Ethnic Cleansing. This is not a casual term but an indictment
with far reaching political, legal and moral implications. The meaning of
this term was clarified in the aftermath of the 1990s' civil war in the
Balkans. Any action by one ethnic group meant to drive out another ethnic
group with the purpose of transforming a mixed ethnic region into a pure one
is Ethnic Cleansing. An action can become Ethnic Cleansing regardless of the
means employed. Every means, from persuasion and threats to expulsions and
mass killings, justifies the attribution of the term to such policies. The
act itself qualifies the categorization of the act: therefore, certain
policies are regarded as Ethnic Cleansing by the international community
even when a master plan for their execution is not found or exposed.
Consequently, the victims of Ethnic Cleansing are both people who left out
of fear and those expelled forcefully as part on an on-going operation. The
above definitions and references can be found in the American State
Department and United Nations websites. These are the principal definitions
that guided the International Court in The Hague when it was setup to try
those responsible for planning and executing the Ethnic Cleansing operations
as people guilty of perpetrating crimes against humanity.
In Plan Dalet, adopted in March 1948 by the high
command of the Hagana (the main Jewish underground in the pre-state days),
the Israeli objective of 1948 is clear. The goal was to take over as much
as possible of the territory of Mandatory Palestine and remove most of the
Palestinian villages and urban neighborhoods from the coveted territory
which would constitute the future Jewish State. The execution was even
more systematic and comprehensive than the plan anticipated. In a matter
of seven months, 531 villages were destroyed and 11 urban neighborhoods
emptied. The mass expulsion was accompanied by massacres, rape and
imprisonment of men (defined as males a bove the age often) in labor camps
for periods over a year. All these characteristics in the year of 2006 can
be only attributed to Ethnic Cleansing policy; namely a policy that,
according to the UN definition, aims at transforming a mixed ethnic area
into a pure ethnic space, where all means are justified. Such a policy is
defined under international law as a crime against humanity which the US
State Department believes can only be rectified by the repatriation of all
the people who left or were expelled as a result of the ethnic cleansing
operations.
The
political implications of such a statement is that Israel is exclusively to
blame for the making of the Palestinian refugee problem and bears legal, as
well as moral responsibility for the problem. The legal implication is that
even if there is obsolesce, after such a long period, for those who
committed a deed which is described as a crime against humanity, the deed
itself is still a crime for which nobody ever was brought to justice. The
moral implication is that indeed the Jewish State, like many other states,
was born out of sin, but the sin, or the crime, was never admitted. Worse,
among certain circles in Israel it is acknowledged and in the same breath
fully justified: justified in the past and in the future as a future policy
against Palestinians wherever they are.
But all these implications were totally ignored by the
Israeli political elite and instead a very different lesson was derived from
the events of 1948. The lesson: you can, as a state, expel half of
Palestine’s population, destroy half of its villages and get away with it
without a scratch or criticism. The consequences of such a lesson were
inevitable: the continuation of the Ethnic Cleansing policies by other
means. There are well-known landmarks in this process, for instance, the
expulsion of tens of villages between 1948 and 1956 from Israel proper, the
forced transfer of 300,000 Palestinians from the West Bank and the Gaza
Strip and a very measured, but constant, cleansing from the Greater
Jerusalem area.
As long as the political lesson is not learned, there
will be no solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The issue of the
refugees will repeatedly fail any attempt, successful as it may be in any
other parameters, to reconcile the two conflicting parties. This is why it
is so important to recognize the 1948 events as an Ethnic Cleansing
operation, so as to ensure that a political solution will not evade the root
of the conflict, namely, the expulsion of the Palestinians. Such evasions in
the past are the main reasons for the collapse of all the previous peace
accords.
As long as the legal lesson is not learned – there will
always remain retributive impulses and revengeful emotions on the
Palestinian side. The legal recognition of the 1948 Nakba as an act
of ethnic cleansing would enable a restitutive justice. This is the process
that has taken place recently in South Africa. The acknowledgement of past
evils is not done in order to bring criminals to justice, but rather in
order to bring the crime itself to public attention and trial. The final
ruling there will not be retributive, there will be no punishment, but
rather restitutive, the victims will be compensated. The most reasonable
compensation for the particular case of the Palestinian refugees was stated
clearly already in December 1948 by the UN General Assembly in its
resolution 194: the unconditional return of the refugees and their families
to their homeland (and homes where possible).
As long as the moral lesson is not learned the state of
Israel will continue to exist as a hostile enclave in the heart of the Arab
world. It will remain the last reminder of the colonialist past that
complicates not only Israeli relationships with Palestinians, but with the
Arab world as a whole. And, because the moral lesson is not fully
comprehended, there exists in Israel justifications for Ethnic Cleansing
both in 1948 and its current forms.
When and how can we hope for these lessons to be learned
and influence the effort to bring peace and reconciliation in Palestine?
First, of course, not much can be expected to happen as long as the present
brutal phase of the occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
continues. And the effort to locate the 1948 ethnic cleansing at the center
of the world's attention and consciousness must continue, alongside the
struggle against the occupation, including tactic of BDS (Boycott,
Divestment and Sanctions) being adopted as the main strategy by civil
society in the Occupied Territories and by the international solidarity
movement. This effort can not be limited to one place. The place where the
Ethnic Cleansing of 1948 occurred, Israel of today, is totally excluded from
this enterprise. The work to raise attention and consciousness inside the
land of the Nakba should continue and be coordinated with
Palestinians and those who support them. With the help of Badil and other
organizations, the Palestinian refugees in Israel, Internally Displaced
Persons, and other leading Palestinian NGOs in Israel, cooperated with a
group of Jewish activists to initiate a serious attempt to bring Ethnic
Cleansing to the attention of the public and argue forcefully and without
any hesitation for the implementation of the Palestinian right of return.
In two conferences supporting the right of return,
Palestinian and Jewish researchers and activists publicly aired their
findingsabouttheethniccleansingfrom1948untiltodayandpresented their ideas on
how best to move forward in educating public opinion about the disastrous
implications – for Palestinians and Jews alike, indeed for the world at
large – of the continued denial of the 1948 Ethnic Cleansing and the refusal
to accept the internationally recognized Right of Return.
On the 58th anniversary and in preparation for the 60th
anniversary we – Palestinians, Israelis and whoever cares for this land –
should demand that the 1948 crime against humanity be included in everyone’s
history books so as to stop the present crimes from continuing before it is
too late.
* Dr. Ilan Pappe is a senior lecturer in the college of political sciences
at the University of Haifa. He is also the head of the Emile Touma
Institute for Palestinian and Israeli Studies, Haifa. Dr. Pappe is
considered one of the new Israeli historians.
-------------------------------
Other Focus Articles (Ongoing Nakba)
-
"From
Generation to Generation"
by Karma
Nabulsi
-
Beautiful
Resistance, Revolting Memory
by Abdelfattah
Abusrour
-
1948 in
Palestine and South Africa
by Salim Vally
-
The Role of
the Church in (de)Constructing Apartheid and Colonization in Palestine
by Alain Epp
Weaver
-
In Search of
Protection: Palestinian Refugees Fleeing Iraq
by Sheila
Provencher
-
The Naqab
(Negev) Under the Microscope: Roots, Reality, Destiny
by Elizabeth
Nasser
-
Palestinians
Exiled in Europe
by Tareq Arar
|