|
|
|
|
The Jewish National Fund (JNF):
A Parastatal Institution Chartered to Dispossess and Discriminate
By BADIL
staff

UN Rejects
JNF Application for Consultative Status
On 18 May
2007, the United Nations’ Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
rejected the application of the JNF for consultative status with the UN
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) by a vote of 8 to 7 with three
abstentions. Consultative status enables NGOs to circulate statements and
participate in relevant international conferences convened by the UN and in
the meetings of their preparatory bodies. The Committee on NGOs, which is
comprised of 19 Member States, decides upon whether or not to grant
NGO-applicants consultative status. Over 2,700 NGOs from all over the world
have been afforded consultative status.

The eight countries voting against the granting of status
to the JNF were Burundi, China, Cuba, Egypt, Guinea, Russian Federation,
Qatar, and Sudan; the seven countries voting in favour were Colombia,
Israel, Peru, Romania, Turkey, United Kingdom, and the United States; and
the three countries abstaining were Angola, India, and Pakistan.
The application was submitted by the JNF branch
registered in the United States, which lobbied hard to gain ECOSOC status
and provided letters of support from powerful members of the US Congress,
such as Senator Hillary Clinton. However, country representatives and the
Palestine Observer Mission to the UN expressed concern about the affiliation
between the organization registered in the US as “Jewish National Fund (Keren
Kayemeth Le Israel) Inc” (JNF-KKL) and the “Keren Kayameth Le Israel” (KKL)
registered in Israel, which carries out land development and settlement
(colonization) activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). While
the US-registered JNF-KKL told the Committee that it was independent and
involved in water, environmental and development projects in the Middle
East, country representatives stated that they were unable to distinguish
between its activities and those of the KKL of Israel. Another main reason
cited for why the application should be rejected was that the JNF’s work
violated the principles of the UN Charter, which emphasizes respect for
human rights and equality.
JNF’s legal
fiction:apublicstatebodyinIsraeland a non-profitNGOin50countries
JNF-KKL was created in 1901 as a subsidiary of the World
Zionist Organization (WZO). Its “primary objective” was to “acquire lands in
Palestine and Syria” for the benefit of “persons of Jewish race, religion or
origin,” and it required its members to include holders of Founders’ Shares
in the Jewish Colonial Trust. The JNF began acquiring lands already in 1905
(by purchase), but the organization was firstregisteredinEnglandin1907.(1)

In 1953, Israel’s “Keren Keyemeth Le Israel Law” (1953)
recognized the JNF for its “public utility” and formally linked it to the
new State of Israel, providing for its continuity under article 6 of the
Status Law (also linking the WZO/Jewish Agency to the State). The JNF then
moved its base to Jerusalem and transferred there the assets of the English
company. The JNF is authorized to exchange and lease, but not sell, land. It
may lease only to Jewish legal persons, according to its own Charter and
under Israel’s Basic Law: Israel Lands. Under the same law, it may lease to
the government-controlled Israel Lands Administration (ILA) and to the Lands
Development Administration, which maintains a JNF-majority governing board.
The 1954-legislated “Covenant between the Government of
Israel [GoI] and the Zionist Executive” clarifies further the WZO/JA
relationship to GoI. It includes recognition of the JNF and United Israel
Appeal as “institutions of the Zionist Organization,” authorizes activities
in Israel to be carried out “by means of public funds,” and indicates, in
its first paragraph, that the Zionist Executive “and its institutions” are
to be treated as part of GoI. Officers of the WZO/JA and JNF also assume
other parallel appointments within the State apparatus, and Israeli law
guarantees WZO/JA and JNF exemptions and waivers on a range of fees and
taxes that are imposed on all others.(2)
Irrespective of its status as part of the GoI, the JNF is
currently registered in over 50 countries as a “charity.” Since 1926, the
JNF has been registered in the United States “Jewish National Fund (Keren
Keyemeth le Israel) Inc.” and maintains a claim there to be a domestic
nonprofit organization. In its annual reports, the organization describes
itself as a partner, or joint venturer, with the JNF registered in Israel (KKL)
and as “the largest contributor to JNF-KKL in the world.” US law provides
that corporation are liable for their partners’ actions, and for actions of
their subsidiaries, if they own a controlling stake. Therefore, the U.S.
registered JNF-KKL is likely to be legally accountable for actions of its
Israeli partner, which violate international law and the Charter of the
United Nations.
JNF: in Violation of the UN
Charter
The JNF, in cooperation with the WZO/JA, funded the
Zionist military effort in the 1947–48 War of Conquest.(3) By 1954, Israel
transferred 35% of the state-controlled lands, mostly belonging to
Palestinian refugees and IDPs, to the JNF in exchange for huge sums
collected from JNF tax-exempt collections abroad. As of 1967, the JNF is an
organic part of the Occupying Power in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. At
present, the JNF controls 13% of the land in Israel exclusively for the
benefit of the Jewish population. In their Concluding Observations, UN
treaty bodies serially have registered their concerns over the
discriminatory nature and governmental functions of JNF and Israel’s other
“national institutions” as incompatible with human rights treaty
obligations.(4)
In the JNF’s own words:
“The JNF is not the trustee of the general public in
Israel. Its loyalty is given to the Jewish people in the Diaspora and in the
state of Israel... The JNF, in relation to being an owner of land, is not a
public body that works for the benefit of all citizens of the state. The
loyalty of the JNF is given to the Jewish people and only to them is the JNF
obligated. The JNF, as the owner of the JNF land, does not have a duty to
practice equality towards all citizens of the state.”
(Response of the JNF, dated December 2004, to a
petition filed by Adalah to the Supreme Court of Israel – HC
9205/04).
This BADIL
report is based on a news update, “UN Rejects Jewish National Fund’s
Application for Consultative Status”, published by Adalah on 22 May 2007,
and on a fact sheet, “Jewish National Fund, a Parastatal Institution
Chartered to Dispossess and Discriminate”, prepared by the Habitat
International Coalition.
Endnotes
1. In its
Memorandum of Association, the JNF objectives are: Article 3(a): “To
purchase, acquire on lease, or in exchange, or receive on lease or
otherwise, lands, forests, rights of possession, easements and any similar
rights, as well as immovable properties of any class…for the purpose of
settling Jews on such lands and properties.” Article 3(c): to
“benefit,whetherdirectlyorindirectly,tothoseofJewishrace or descendency”
Article 3(g): “…promote the interests of Jews in the prescribed region.”
Article 6: “upon dissolution…any properties whatsoever…shall be transferred
to the Government of Israel.” Article 7 and Article of the Association of
Keren Kayemeth leIsrael 2, 3, & 4: “The members of the General Council of
the World Zionist Organization [or its replacement] shall be deemed members
of the Association.”
2. Walter
Lehn, with Uri Davis, Jewish National Fund (London: Kegan Paul, 1988),
96–99.
3. “Report
of the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry,” cited in Mallison and. Mallison,
op cit., p. 39.
4.
E/C.12/1/Add.27, 4 December 1998, paras. 11, 35; E/C.12/1/Add.90, 23 May
2003, para. 27; CERD/C/ISR/CO/13, 14 June 2007, para. 19.
|
Home |
Editorial
|
Commentary |
Focus Articles |
General Articles |
Resources |
Documents | Archives
|
About al-Majdal |
Contact Us
| BADIL Home |
|
|