BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights is an independent, community-based non-profit organization mandated to defend and promote the rights of Palestinian refugees and IDPs. Our vision, missions, programs and relationships are defined by our Palestinian identity and the principles of international law, in particular international human rights law. We seek to advance the individual and collective rights of the Palestinian people on this basis.
باستضافة كريمة من لجنة حق العودة – فرنسا والجالية الفلسطينية في باريس، ِتم افتتاح اللقاء التنسيقي التاسع لائتلاف حق العودة في مدينة باريس – فرنسا صباح يوم 20 تشرين الثاني 2009 وبمشاركة أعضاء الائتلاف، وعدد من الفعاليات والشخصيات الفاعلة في مجال الدفاع عن حقوق الشعب الفلسطيني. وقد تم استعراض الأوضاع العامة، وأهمية دور حركة الدفاع عن حق العودة في ظل الظروف الراهنة.
كما في اللقاءات السنوية السابقة، جاء انعقاد اللقاء السنوي التاسع للائتلاف الفلسطيني لحق العودة في ظل ظروف تزداد تعقيدا، سواء تلك المتصلة بالوضع الفلسطيني الداخلي، أو تلك المتعلقة بمسيرة المفاوضات، أو تلك المتعلقة باستمرار فشل المجتمع الدولي ودبلوماسية الغرب في حل ومعالجة الصراع
Decision of Palestinian Leadership and International Pressure an Insult to the Victims
Statement of Palestinian Civil Society Responding to Deferral on Goldstone Recommendations Endorsement, issued by:
Adalah * Addameer * Aldameer * Al Haq * Al Mezan * Arab Association for Human Rights * Badil * Civic Coalition for Jerusalem * DCI-Palestine * ENSAN Centre * ITTJIAH * Independent Commission for Human Rights * Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Centre * Palestinian Centre for Human Rights * Ramallah Centre for Human Rights Studies * Women’s Centre for Legal Aid and Counselling *
Badil Statement, 2 October 2009 – The recommendations of the UN fact finding mission to the Gaza Strip headed by Judge Richard Goldstone represented a golden opportunity for the Human Rights Council, the Security Council, the General Assembly, and all member states – particularly the United States and the European Union – to exercise their moral and legal obligations to hold Israel accountable for its crimes committed during its 2008-2009 war against Gaza. Yet the official Palestinian position calling for the postponement of the vote to endorse the report's recommendations now hamstrings these opportunities. In so doing, it has undermined the principle of international legitimacy as a basis to resolve the Palestinian issue and prevents the Palestinian victims of this assault from achieving redress.
1. Scope of Palestinian Displacement 2008
The Palestinian refugee and IDP population described here comprises the total estimated number of Palestinians and their descendants whose “country of origin” is the former Palestine (now divided into Israel and the OPT), who have been displaced within or outside the borders of this area, and who do not have access to voluntary durable solutions and/or reparation, including the right to return to their homes of origin and the right to repossess their properties.
Joint written statement submitted to the U.N. Human Rights Council, Twelfth Session
14 September - 2 October 2009
Agenda Item 6 (i)
9 July 2008 - Statement:
“We oppose the upgrade of relations between EU and Israel and call for the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement”
On Monday, 16 June 2008, the European Union and Israel agreed to upgrade their relations within the framework of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. This starts a process to end in April 2009 with the definition of a common Action Plan that involves the adoption of initiatives and the creation of stronger ties in a broad spectrum, including economic, trade, academic, security and diplomatic fields. We are appalled by the EU's blatant refusal to hold Israel to account for its persistent violations of human rights and international law.
Update on Ariel Sharon: In early March a Belgian Court of Appeals agreed to a request submitted by lawyers for the survivors of the Sabra and Shatila massacre to reopen the legal debate concerning the admissibility of the case against Ariel Sharon for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide and Belgium’s competence to judge the case under the principle of Universal Jurisdiction. The legal team submitted the request in late February following a ruling earlier in the month by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that a Belgian arrest warrant for the acting Foreign Minister of the Democratic Republic of Congo violated international law because it failed to respect the Minister’s “immunity from criminal jurisdiction.”