End apartheid, freedom and equality for all
by Bangani Ngeleza*
and Adri Nieuwhof**
BDS was the first prefered pathway chosen by Palestinian
refugees (51%); see p.5
Liberation movements in South Africa set the agenda with an overall
goal to end apartheid and achieve freedom and equality for all.
This goal and vision is encapsulated in the Freedom Charter which
was adopted in 1955 at a people’s congress held in Kliptown near
Johannesburg.1 The adoption of the Freedom Charter
followed months of wide scale consultation by volunteers who
crisscrossed the country asking people about the kind of South
Africa they would want to live in.2 Since then,
liberation movements, civil society and solidarity groups steered
in the same direction to realize the overall goal.
Prior to the adoption of the
Freedom Charter, the African National Congress (ANC) and the South
African Indian Congress launched a non-violent “Campaign of
Defiance against Unjust Laws” in June 1952. Over 8,000 peopleof all
racial origins joined the protests risking arrest over violation of
discriminatory laws and regulations.3 The protest
caught the attention of Asian-African member states of the United
Nations General Assembly (UNGA), who put the question of racist
apartheid policies in South Africa on the agenda. The UNGA
established a commission to study the situation resulting in the
adoption of UNGA resolution 820 (IX) on apartheid in December
1954.4
South Africa's racial policies were also strongly condemned by
Asian and African nations at the 1955 Bandung conferencewhich aimed
to mobilize forces to promote peace. The participating countries
were dissatisfied with thereluctance of the Western powers to
consult them on matters concerning Asia andAfrica.5
South African liberation movement leaders, Moses Kotane and Maulvi
I.A. Cachalia, addressed the conference based on a 32 page
memorandum which set out the vicious effects of apartheid
policies.6 They also met Prime Minister Nehru of
India andPresident Nasser of Egypt who introduced them to the other
state leaders at the conference.7 From then on the
struggle against apartheid received increasing support in Asia and
Africa.
Inside South Africa, grassroots mass mobilization against apartheid
laws was sustained by organizations such as the ANC, the Pan
African Congress and the South African Indian Congress. On 21 March
1960, a peaceful demonstration against the pass laws8 turned violent when the police shot at
African demonstrators in Sharpeville, killing 69 men, women and
children and wounding around 200 people.9
The massacre sparked worldwide attention, and African and Asian
member states called for an urgent meeting of the Security
Council.10 One month later, in April 1960, the
Security Council adopted resolution 134 deploring the policies and
actions of the South African Government which had caused the loss
of life of so many Africans.11 In this first action on
South Africa, the Security Council called upon the country to
abandon its policies of apartheid and racial discrimination. This
resolution represented a significant breakthrough and laid the
ground for future UN actions.
The resolution also gave momentum to the Boycott, Divestment and
Sanctions (BDS) movement against apartheid.12 By
June1960, boycotts of South African goods were implemented in many
countries; and independent African States called for sanctions
against South Africa at a conference held in Addis Ababa that same
month.13
Three years later, apartheid was declared a crime against humanity
by the UNGA in Resolution 2202 (XXI).14 Less than a
decadelater, in 1974, South Africa was suspended by the General
Assembly from participating in its work due to international
opposition to the policy of apartheid15; further the
Security Council endorsed the UNGA's position that apartheid is a
crime against humanity in resolution 556 of 1984.16
ANC calls for punitive measures after decades of
dialogue
In 1959, ANC president Chief Albert
Luthuli publicly called for a boycott of South Africa. He told his
audience in the UK,“…non-white South Africans have responded to
attacks on them by sending deputations and submitted petitions to
the authorities… When these approaches were unsuccessful, they
turned to passive resistance and then boycott”.17
From this point onwards, the ANC sent delegations to address the
international community on the need to isolate the apartheid
regime. The call for international pressure through boycotts,
divestment and sanctions became an important pillar of the ANC’s
struggle for democracy.18
In response to Chief Luthuli's call, a Boycott Movement was founded
at a meeting of South African exiles and their supporters in London
on 26 June 1959.19 Julius Nyerere, president of
Tanzania, who participated in the meeting, said “We are not asking
you, the British people, for anything special. We are just asking
you to withdraw your support from apartheid by not buying South
African goods”.20 The boycott attracted widespread
support from students, trade unions and the political parties.
After the 1960 Sharpeville massacre21 it was
decided to intensify efforts beyond a consumer boycott, and this is
how the London based Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) was born. The
group would coordinate the anti-apartheid work and keep South
Africa's apartheid policy in the forefront. The total isolation of
apartheid South Africa, including economic sanctions, became the
focus of the campaign.22 At the time, the UK was
the largest foreign investor in South Africa, and the government
was reluctant to sever ties.23
Arms embargo
The UN Special Committee against
Apartheid (Special Committee) was established in 1962.24 The General Assembly called for
measures against the South African government in Resolution 1761,
including to break off diplomatic relations, to close ports to all
vessels flying the South African flag, to boycott all South African
goods, to refrain from exporting goods to South Africa, and to
refuse landing and passage facilities to all South African
aircraft.25
The ANC and PAC advocated for an arms embargo as a first step, and
following this call, the Special Committee against Apartheid
recommended the Security Council to adopt such arms
embargo.26 It further suggested an effective oil
embargo as a second step.27 The Security Council
decided in favor of a voluntary arms embargo by calling upon states
to cease the sale and shipment of arms, ammunition and military
vehicles to South Africa in Resolution 181 of August
196328, three years after the Sharpeville
massacre.
The Soweto uprising in June 1976 fired up the anti-apartheid
movement when the apartheid police shot tear gas and live bullets
at students protesting the inferior education system reserved for
black students.29 Many students were killed and
injured.30 Solidarity groups stepped up their
efforts to boycott the apartheid regime and broadened the basis for
governments to act. Disturbed by the extent of the brutal
oppression, the Security Council imposed a mandatory arms embargo
against South Africa in November of 1977.31
In December 1984, the UN Security Council further requested states
to cease any imports of arms, ammunition and military vehicles from
South Africa in Resolution 558, though this was not
mandatory.32 Again, the decision was taken in
response to the increasing violence against the mass resistance of
the black population.
Oil embargo
An oil embargo was high on the
ANC's priority list of punitive measures because South Africa was
completely dependent on oil imports.33 The General
Assembly called for an oil embargo in November 1963 in a resolution
which addressed South Africa's illegal occupation of
Namibia.34 It was the first of many efforts by
the UN to enact effective oil sanctions against apartheid.
In the early 1970s Iran was the major supplier of crude oil to
South Africa. But Iran cut off South Africa after the fall of the
Shah in 1978.35
The General Assembly repeated a call for a voluntary international
oil embargo against South Africa in 1987 again, this time based on
the country's apartheid policies36. However, efforts
by African countries for a mandatory oil embargo in the Security
Council failed due to a veto of the United States and the United
Kingdom.37
As oil was fueling the apartheid economy, campaigns for an oil
embargo were organized in several Western countries. Shell was a
major target in the Netherlands being an Anglo-Dutch company with a
presence in South Africa making profits at the expense of the black
population.38 The Dutch Shipping Research Bureau
was founded to monitor oil deliveries to South Africa by two
solidarity groups in 1981.39 In its yearly reports,
boycott breakers were exposed. The bureau cooperated closely with
the ANC and UN bodies.40
Due to the oil embargo, South Africa's oil import costs more than
doubled. “Between 1973 and 1984 the Republic of South Africa had to
pay R22 billion (over 1.3 billion dollars) more than it would have
normally spent,” apartheid president P.W. Botha told a Namibian
newspaper in 1986.41
Sports boycott
All types of sport in apartheid
South Africa were segregated by race. Only white sports bodies were
represented in international sports organizations including the
International Olympic Committee (IOC). As a result, only white
South Africans played for their country at the
Olympics.42
In the 1950's, South African sportsmen fought against racism in
sport by pushing for international recognition of non-racial South
African sports bodies. The demand for equality in sports followed
from the Freedom Charter which called for equality for all. The
non-racial sportsmen founded the South African Non-Racial Olympic
Committee which cooperated closely with the ANC representation in
London and the anti-apartheid movement.43 South Africa
was formally expelled from the IOC in 1970 after years of
lobbying.44
Anti-apartheid groups, African and Asian countries and the UN dealt
out severe blows to apartheid sport. In 1968, the General Assembly
had called on states and organizations "to suspend cultural,
educational, sporting and other exchanges with the racist regime
and with organizations or institutions in South Africa which
practice apartheid”.45 Rugby tours to Britain and
Australia in 1969 and 1971 were met with mass
demonstrations.46 The Australian Air Force had to
transport the South African team because of trade union
actions.47 The State of Queensland declared a
state of emergency during one of the tours.48 A rugby
tour of New Zealand was canceled because of public opposition and a
threat by India and African countries to boycott the Commonwealth
Games in Christchurch in 1974.49
In 1980, the Special Committee against Apartheid initiated a
"Register of Sports Contacts with South Africa" listing sportsmen
who participated in events in South Africa.50 Several governments
prohibited the boycott violators from playing in their countries.
Those who profited from apartheid, and showed contempt for the
majority of the South African people, they said, would not be
allowed to make money in their countries.51
When awareness of apartheid increased, more countries undertook
action against the sportsmen on the UN Registers. Hundreds of local
authorities in Britain and other Western countries denied them use
of their sports facilities.52
South Africa was expelled from most international sports bodies by
1980.53 The UN international Convention
against Apartheid in Sports of 1985 was adopted after years of
preparation.54 It provided for action against those
continuing to play with apartheid.55
Cultural boycott
The cultural boycott of South
Africa was initiated by artists and their unions in the UK, Ireland
and the US in the 1960s. The South African regime responded with
window dressing initiatives to deceive world public opinion. It
gave permission, for example, to some mixed performances in a few
theaters.
The General Assembly took a stand in favor of the cultural boycott
in December 1980.56 The Special Committee decided to
publish a list of entertainers who had performed in apartheid South
Africa.57
The Special Committee wanted to persuade artists to stop
entertaining apartheid, to stop profiting from apartheid money and
to stop serving the propaganda purposes of the apartheid
regime.
Black organizations in South Africa supported the cultural boycott
with protests against foreign entertainers who defied the
boycott.
Conclusions
The fight against apartheid in
South Africa was guided by a clear strategy of the liberation
movements as laid down in the Freedom Charter. The overall goal was
to end apartheid and achieve freedom and equality for all. During
the struggle, the overall goal was broken down into specific BDS
sub-goals to hold the South African apartheid regime to account.
For this purpose, the South African liberation movements cooperated
with UN bodies and solidarity groups around the world to achieve
its BDS targets.
Many Palestinians support the call for BDS activism against Israel
until it will respect international law and the rights of the
Palestinians. The challenge for the Palestinians is to reflect on
the question whether the Palestinian Liberation Organization can
play a leading role, like the South African movements, at both
national and international levels.
---------------------
*
Bangani Ngelezais a management consultant based in
South Africa. He was actively involved in the South African
struggle against apartheid and has visited with Palestine on a few
occasions to share insights with civil society organizations there
on strategies to fight against the occupation. He has also
co-authored a few articles comparing Israel and Apartheid South
Africa.
** Adri
Nieuwhofis a human rights advocate based in the
Netherlands and former anti-apartheid activist at the Holland
Committee on Southern Africa.
Note: In writing the article the
authors have substantially drawn from the archives of the ANC which
contains invaluable contributions by Enuga Reddy, Director of the
Special Committee against Apartheid.
http://www.anc.org.za/